Background: While increases in body mass index (BMI) have been associated with the incidence and prevalence of asthma, the mechanisms behind this association are unclear.
Methods: We hypothesised that BMI would be independently associated with measures of asthma severity in a population of children with mild to moderate asthma enrolled in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP). A multivariable baseline cross sectional analysis of BMI with our outcomes of interest was performed.
Results: BMI was generally not associated with symptoms, nor was it associated with atopy. While BMI was positively associated with the methacholine concentration that causes a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20FEV1), this association did not persist after adjustment for FEV1. Increasing BMI was associated with increasing FEV1 (β = 0.006 l, 95% CI (0.001 to 0.01)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (β = 0.012 l, 95% CI (0.007 to 0.017)). However, decrements in the FEV1/FVC ratio were noted with increasing BMI (β = −0.242, 95% CI (−0.118 to −0.366)). Thus, an increase in BMI of 5 units was associated with a decrease in FEV1/FVC of over 1%.
Conclusions: Although the association of FEV1 and FVC with BMI did not support our initial hypothesis, the decrease noted in the FEV1/FVC ratio has potential relevance in the relationship between BMI and asthma severity.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Over the past 20 years the incidence and prevalence of obesity among the youth in America have steadily increased. The most recent data from the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) revealed a prevalence of obesity—defined as a body mass index (BMI) in excess of 95% of the age specific distribution—of 14% in children aged 6–11 surveyed between 1988 and 1994.1 In comparison, NHANES II, conducted between 1976 and 1980, found a prevalence of obesity of 7.6% for the same population. This has been accompanied by a similar rise in the associated rates of asthma. The CDC self-reported prevalence of asthma in children aged 5–14 rose from 42.8 per 1000 in 1980 to 74.4 per 1000 in 1994.2
Given the dramatic rise in the prevalence of obesity and asthma, it is not surprising that there has been an increasing body of literature on the association between BMI and asthma. In the paediatric population, increases in BMI have been associated with an increased incidence3 and prevalence4–7 of asthma. At the extremes of BMI, a similar increase in the prevalence of asthma has been noted with overweight8 and obesity in children.9 Furthermore, this relationship may be influenced by sex. While greater preadolescent asthma incidence10 and severity11,12 have generally been associated with boys, the obesity/asthma relationship may be a phenomenon of girls. The risk of prevalent asthma has been found to be higher in obese girls than non-obese girls or boys of any body mass in cross sectional studies of German children.13 Additionally, increases in BMI have been associated with incident wheezing, peak flow variability, and bronchodilator response in girls of school age but not boys.14
While the association between increased BMI and asthma is well documented, the mechanisms behind this association in children are unclear. We hypothesised that BMI would be independently related to asthma severity as reflected by pulmonary function, symptom outcomes, and relevant intermediate phenotypes in asthmatic children. We considered that these effects might be modified by sex. These hypotheses were examined using the baseline data from a cohort of children in the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) study.
The CAMP study is a randomised clinical trial comprising 1041 children with asthma. The trial design and methodology have been previously published.15 Inclusion criteria included: age 5–12, asthma for at least 6 months, mild to moderate asthma severity, and methacholine sensitivity with a provocative concentration (PC20) of no more than 12.5 mg/ml. Demographic data; home environment characteristics; asthma symptoms, severity, and treatment; allergy history; and relevant family history were collected at baseline. Each patient’s parent or guardian signed a consent statement. All information and measures were collected at the time of randomisation, following a screening period of at least 28 days on salbutamol (albuterol) on an as needed basis only.
Pulmonary function testing
Spirometric and methacholine testing were performed on a Collins Stead-Wells dry seal Survey III spirometer.15 At least three acceptable manoeuvres meeting American Thoracic Society (ATS) standards were required, with at least two reproducible forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) manoeuvres within 5% of best required for each test. Airway responsiveness was performed in a standardised fashion, at least 4 hours after use of short acting bronchodilators and 24 hours after use of long acting bronchodilators.15
BMI was calculated from measured values of height and weight by the equation BMI = weight (kg)/height2 (m2). Pulmonary function outcomes included pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio, and peak flow, analysed as quantitative traits. Asthma symptom outcomes were dichotomised and considered relevant as follows: school absences (>5, since fewer than this might be expected from non-asthma factors), emergency department visits and hospital admissions (any), doctor visits (>6, since reasonable visits may be expected every other month for a healthy asthmatic), days on oral steroids (>7, since up to a week’s worth may be dispensed for mild asthma), physical education restriction (any reported), and cough/wheeze at rest or with exercise (>once/month over 6 months). Outcomes were based upon occurrences over past year, except steroid days (past 6 months) and cough/wheeze (monthly average over the past 6 months). Intermediate phenotypes of asthma and atopy included FEV1 change with bronchodilator and log transformations of PC20, serum IgE, and eosinophil count, evaluated in a quantitative fashion.
BMI was the primary predictor of interest. Potential confounders included clinic attended, age, race, sex, caregiver education, family income, familial asthma history, presence of environmental tobacco smoke, and participant Tanner stage. Tanner stage was defined by male genital and female breast development. BMI was modelled as a linear term, while the other potential confounders were either dichotomised or categorised into groups. Additional analyses using other surrogates of total body fat (waist circumference and waist to hip ratio) as predictors were also performed. Finally, analyses of the upper extremes of BMI were performed using age, ethnic, and sex specific BMI percentile cut offs of 85% for overweight and 95% for obese.16
Univariate and multivariable regression analyses incorporating significant potential confounders were performed. Modelling using linear regression was performed for all of the pulmonary function and intermediate phenotype outcomes. Symptom outcomes were modelled using logistic regression techniques. Height adjustment was performed for models evaluating the FEV1, FVC, and peak flows. Collinearity diagnostics were performed. Potential for effect modification of sex with BMI was evaluated by use of stratified analyses and interaction terms. The assumption of linearity within the BMI predictor was assessed by dividing BMI into quintiles and looking for threshold and non-linear effects. To further evaluate the potential for the age dependency of BMI, Box-Cox transformations of age on BMI were performed. We then re-evaluated all of our models using the transformed BMI, thereby verifying our results in an a priori age adjusted fashion. Since the transformed BMI results were similar in magnitude but difficult to interpret, we have used the non-transformed, age adjusted BMI in reporting our results. All analyses were performed using the SAS statistical software package (Version 6.12, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Table 1 presents baseline descriptive data on the BMI of 1039 asthmatic children participating in the CAMP study. 123 of the children (11.8%) met the criteria for obesity and a further 181 (17.4%) for overweight. Overall, asthma was mild in these children, with a mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 of 102% predicted. As expected, BMI was significantly associated with measures of growth and development such as age and Tanner stage. Other significant potential confounders associated with BMI in the univariate analysis included ethnicity, clinical centre, and presence of any parental smoking. Sex, parental income, caregiver education, and history of parental asthma were not significantly associated with BMI. Since age is closely correlated with BMI in children, we reassessed all analyses using a Box-Cox transformation of age on BMI to provide age adjusted estimates of the relationships. The results of these subsequent analyses paralleled our primary results (data not shown).
Relationship between BMI and respiratory symptoms
The relationship between BMI and reported measures of asthma severity are shown in table 2. In the multivariable analysis only cough/wheeze with exercise was related to BMI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10 for more than one coughing/wheezing episode with exercise per month over the past 6 months).
Relationship between BMI and other measures of body fat and intermediate phenotypes of asthma and atopy
The four intermediate phenotypes of interest—eosinophil count, IgE level, bronchodilator response, and methacholine sensitivity—and their adjusted relationship to BMI, waist circumference, and waist to hip ratio are shown in table 3. BMI was negatively associated with bronchodilator response (β = −0.003, p = 0.02)—that is, as BMI increased, small decrements in the response to bronchodilators were noted. A higher BMI was also related to a higher logPC20 (less airways reactivity). However, after adjustment for baseline levels of FEV1, this effect was no longer seen. Neither of the measures of atopy (IgE and eosinophil count) was significantly associated with BMI. No consistent relationship between the measures of body fat (BMI, waist circumference, and waist to hip ratio) and any of the intermediate phenotype outcomes was noted.
Relationship between BMI and pulmonary function
Table 4 shows the post-bronchodilator multivariable relationship between BMI and pulmonary function outcomes. BMI was positively associated with spirometric measurements including FEV1, FVC, and peak flow. Pre-bronchodilator trends were similar (data not shown). The strongest relationships were noted for FVC. Specifically, an increase in BMI of 5 units (as would occur between normal weight and obesity) was associated with a gain in FVC of slightly more than 60 ml. Increases in BMI were thus associated with increased spirometric pulmonary function. In contrast, significant decrements in the FEV1/FVC ratio were noted in association with increasing BMI (p for trend for boys = 0.002; fig 1).
The strength of the BMI effects on pulmonary function seemed to vary when stratified by sex. Although the direction of the effect was the same for both sexes, the association with BMI was significant only in girls in relation to the FEV1, change in FEV1 with bronchodilator, and log PC20 (table 4). The relationship between BMI and both pre- and post-bronchodilator FVC was also stronger in girls than in boys. However, the FEV1/FVC ratio decrements with increasing BMI were more substantial in boys. Univariate analysis of the relationship between sex and the potential confounders of pulmonary function was performed. There were no significant differences between boys and girls with regard to height, ethnicity, age, parental smoking, or clinic. The addition of interaction terms to models evaluating sex and BMI as predictors of pulmonary function outcomes did not show a significant interaction between sex and BMI in any of the multivariable models tested (data not shown).
BMI quintile analysis
Age adjusted BMI quintile analysis was performed (fig 2). For both boys and girls spirometric measures (FEV1, FVC, and peak flow) increased in a linear fashion as the BMI quintile increased. No significant within group differences were noted for either bronchodilator response or PC20. Overall, no overt threshold effects were noted. Modelling BMI as a linear predictor of pulmonary function therefore seems reasonable. Moreover, while the results of obesity specific analyses paralleled our other results, the lack of a threshold suggests that the extremes of weight did not have a unique association with our outcomes. No results of obesity specific analyses are therefore presented.
The overall magnitude and direction of the associations seen do not support the hypothesis that increasing BMI significantly contributes to overall asthma severity in a large cross sectional population of children with mild to moderate asthma. In general, increasing body mass was correlated with increasing spirometric values and was not associated with asthma symptoms. The notable exception to this was the association of increasing BMI with decrements in the FEV1/FVC ratio. The relationship between BMI and the intermediate phenotypes of asthma evaluated, however, were less clear. While measures of atopy were not correlated with BMI, we did find a significant relationship between BMI and two common intermediate phenotypes of asthma—change in FEV1 with bronchodilator and degree of methacholine sensitivity. However, no significant relationship between BMI and PC20 remained after adjustment for baseline FEV1, suggesting that this effect may have been driven by underlying airways size. This was further supported by the lack of association between these measures of airway responsiveness and waist circumference and waist to hip ratio.
Previous population based studies of children have reported increases in spirometric measurements with increases in body weight and BMI. In calculating reference values for FEV1 and FVC, however, early studies concluded that adjustment for weight was unnecessary because the additional explained variance was small after adjustment for height, sex, and race.17,18 Lazarus et al19 reported a much larger positive association of weight with height adjusted FEV1 and FVC in a cross sectional study of normal schoolchildren. However, they subsequently found decreases in height and weight adjusted spirometric measures with increasing skinfold thicknesses, concluding that an increased BMI in children may not adequately distinguish increased lean tissue mass from increased fat mass. Fung et al20 also noted increased spirometric flows correlating to increased BMI in a population of Chinese schoolchildren. Nevertheless, overweight children (>90% predicted) had decrements in these pulmonary measures in association with increasing BMI, supporting other studies which noted a classic restrictive ventilatory defect in obese children.21 In contrast, only one of our subjects had an age adjusted BMI in excess of 150% of predicted. Any expected decline in spirometric parameters due to large increases in fat mass would not therefore have been powered to be detected in our study. Overall, our data suggest that the small but significant increases in FEV1 and FVC seen in normal children in association with increases in BMI are also present in children with mild to moderate asthma (table 4, fig 2).
Although airway responsiveness (AHR) has recently been correlated with asthma severity in children,22 little is known about the relationship between BMI and intermediate phenotypes of asthma, including measures of atopy, AHR, and bronchodilator response. In a cross sectional population based study of teenagers in Taiwan, Huang et al23 noted a decreased prevalence of AHR in the lowest quintile of BMI in teenage girls and increased atopy in girls with the highest BMI. These findings were not seen in boys. While other studies have not noted any independent effect of BMI on methacholine sensitivity,24,25 the consistent association of obesity with exercise induced bronchospasm in children26,27 has suggested a relationship between increased AHR and BMI. Although our cohort of asthmatic children differed from the above, the initial finding of a positive association between PC20 and BMI was still somewhat puzzling. However, this effect was not found when the regression was adjusted for airway size, nor was it seen with other measures of body fat (table 3). Similarly, none of the other intermediate phenotypes were consistently associated with any of the proxies for body fat mass.
The exact reason why the relationship between BMI and pulmonary function would be stronger in one sex in our study population (table 4) is unknown. However, this prepubertal relationship can be most readily explained by differential airways size. Throughout childhood girls have larger airways in relation to lung size than boys, a phenomenon that begins to reverse in adolescence.28 While airway size can help to explain the differential spirometric values noted in our study, smaller airway calibre has also been used to explain the increased AHR in adult women.29 Similarly, the findings of decreased AHR and bronchodilator responsiveness in the girls relative to the boys in our study may be simply related to differential airway calibre.
We cannot exclude the possibility that differences in sample size between the boys and girls in our study could account for our finding that decrements in FEV1/FVC ratio noted with increasing BMI were more prominent in the CAMP boys (fig 1); however, differences in airway size between boys and girls may also play a role. The FEV1/FVC ratio is commonly used as a measure of the degree of airflow obstruction and severity of asthma. While ratio measures are described in few population based studies of paediatric lung function, in young children overall measures of airflow to FVC are decreased in boys compared with girls30,31 and in asthmatics compared with non-asthmatics.12 Increasing BMI correlated with decreasing FEV1/FVC ratio in one other population based study of paediatric spirometry.32 This association was also greater in boys. While the presence of asthma in that study did not appear to affect the relationship between BMI and FEV1/FVC ratio, only 7% of these children reported a diagnosis of asthma, probably resulting in insufficient power for detection. Whether these differences help to explain the increased incidence of asthmatic symptoms in prepubertal boys requires further study.
While we found that many of the effects noted were stronger in one sex, analyses failed to note a significant interaction between sex and BMI. It is likely, given the modest effects noted as well as the parallel direction of the effects within each sex, that a larger sample size or sicker patient population could have resulted in significant interaction terms.
The overall direction and magnitude of the relationships between BMI and the outcomes of interest in this study do not support a significant detrimental association between increasing BMI and asthma severity in children. The potential reasons for this departure from our hypothesised relationships are several. Firstly, our source population, a cohort of children with pre-existing asthma, differs from the general population based cohorts used in the incidence3,14 and prevalence4–7 studies associating asthma and BMI. Moreover, comparisons of within group phenotypes are not comparable to studies evaluating differences between asthmatic and normal subjects. The strict entry criteria for this clinical trial15 may also not have provided enough variability in the outcomes of interest to detect differences in our predictor of interest. Previous studies of asthma symptoms have used primarily inner city subjects,33,34 a population which contrasts with that of the CAMP children.15 Additionally, many of these previous studies focused on obesity and asthma. Only one of the children enrolled in CAMP had a baseline BMI in excess of 150% of predicted for age. Thus, any potential associations due to extremes of BMI would not have been adequately powered within our cohort. In this study, BMI was modelled as our primary surrogate of total body fat. The usefulness of this measure in children has been criticised.19 The best epidemiological measure of body fat in children and adolescents remains controversial,35 but may be one using skinfold measures which were not assessed in CAMP. Hence, BMI used as a primary predictor may not have adequately distinguished between large children and obese ones. Finally, in a previous study of incident asthma in children, asthma risk was inversely related to Tanner stage in boys (RR 0.3 for stage V compared with stage I) but positively related to Tanner stage in girls (RR 1.6 for stage V compared with stage I).3 If puberty is highly correlated with any of our outcomes of interest, our study may not have been powered to detect these associations. The report of a much stronger association between BMI and the prevalence of asthma in children over 10 years of age compared with younger children8 lends support to this possibility. Over 90% of our cohort were Tanner stages I or II, and less than 3% were stages IV or V at baseline assessment.
Our study also suffers from the limitations common to cross sectional studies. Certainly the association between BMI and pulmonary function cannot demonstrate causality or even the direction of the relationship. One could infer that children with higher FEV1 and FVC levels are more apt to eat more and therefore increase their BMI or, equally, that BMI levels directly alter levels of pulmonary function. Longitudinal studies within a cohort of asthmatic subjects are necessary to help clarify this relationship.
In conclusion, we have noted changes in spirometric pulmonary function related to BMI in a cohort of asthmatic children. BMI at baseline, however, was not prominently related to respiratory symptomatology or to any of four prominent intermediate phenotypes of asthma and atopy. Although these findings do not support our original hypothesis, the discovery of a decrement in the FEV1/FVC ratio in association with increasing BMI suggests that a significant relationship may yet exist. Further studies evaluating specific aspects of the BMI/asthma relationship are warranted. Such studies evaluating change in BMI over time, extremes of body mass effects, or sex specific pubertal changes on this relationship may provide further insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of childhood asthma.
The Childhood Asthma Management Program is supported by contracts NO1-HR-16044, 16045, 16046, 16047, 16048, 16049, 16050, 16051, and 16052 with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and General Clinical Research Center grants M01RR00051, M01RR0099718-24, M01RR02719-14, and RR00036 from the National Center for Research Resources.
Dr Tantisira is supported by NIH: 2T32 HL07427, Clinical Epidemiology of Lung Diseases, Dr Litonjua is supported by a Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Award: KO8-HL03870, and Dr Fuhlbrigge is supported by a Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Award: KO8 HL03919-01, from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Funding: The Childhood Asthma Management Program is supported by contracts NO1-HR-16044, 16045, 16046, 16047, 16048, 16049, 16050, 16051, and 16052 with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and General Clinical Research Center grants M01RR00051, M01RR0099718-24, M01RR02719-14, and RR00036 from the National Center for Research Resources.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.