Article Text

See original article:

Comparison of exhaled and nasal nitric oxide and exhaled carbon monoxide levels in bronchiectatic patients with and without primary ciliary dyskinesia
Free
  1. I Horváth2,
  2. S Loukides1,
  3. T Wodehouse1,
  4. E Csiszér2,
  5. P J Cole1,
  6. S A Kharitonov1,
  7. P J Barnes1
  1. 1Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute at Imperial College, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Pathophysiology, National Koranyi Institute for Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor P J Barnes, Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK;
    p.j.barnes{at}ic.ac.uk

Abstract

Background: Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is associated with chronic airway inflammation resulting in bronchiectasis.

Methods: The levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), carbon monoxide (eCO) and nasal NO (nNO) from bronchiectatic patients with PCD (n=14) were compared with those from patients with non-PCD bronchiectasis without (n=31) and with cystic fibrosis (CF) (n=20) and from normal subjects (n=37) to assess the clinical usefulness of these measurements in discriminating between PCD and other causes of bronchiectasis.

Results: Exhaled NO levels were lower in patients with PCD than in patients with non-PCD non-CF bronchiectasis or healthy subjects (median (range) 2.1 (1.3–3.5) ppb v 8.7 (4.5–26.0) ppb, p<0.001; 6.7 (2.6–11.9) ppb, p<0.001, respectively) but not lower than bronchiectatic patients with CF (3.0 (1.5–7.5) ppb, p>0.05). Nasal levels of nNO were significantly lower in PCD patients than in any other subjects (PCD: 54.5 (5.0–269) ppb, non-PCD bronchiectasis without CF: 680 (310–1000) ppb, non-PCD bronchiectasis with CF: 343 (30–997) ppb, control: 663 (322–1343) ppb). In contrast, eCO levels were higher in all patient groups than in control subjects (PCD: 4.5 (3.0–24.0) ppm, p<0.01, other bronchiectasis without CF: 5.0 (3.0–15.0) ppm, p<0.001; CF: 5.3 (2.0–23.0) ppm, p<0.001 v 3.0 (0.5–5.0) ppm). Low values in both eNO and nNO readings (<2.4 ppb and <187 ppb, respectively) identified PCD patients from other bronchiectatic patients with a specificity of 98% and a positive predictive value of 92%.

Conclusion: The simultaneous measurement of eNO and nNO is a useful screening tool for PCD.

  • exhaled nitric oxide
  • exhaled carbon monoxide
  • bronchiectasis
  • primary ciliary dyskinesia
  • cystic fibrosis
  • nasal nitric oxide

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Publisher's Correction

    Please note that there was an error in the labelling for Figure 1. The correct version on the figure is available here as a downloadable PDF (printer friendly file).

    If you do not have Adobe Reader installed on your computer,
    you can download this free-of-charge, please Click here

     

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • [View PDF] - Figure 1 Exhaled nitric oxide, nasal nitric oxide, and exhaled carbon monoxide concentrations in normal subjects, patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) with documented bronchiectasis, and patients with non-PCD bronchiectasis with and without cystic fibrosis (CF). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences between mediator levels (p <_0.0001.-- end="end" desc="desc" dc1="dc1" _1="_1" _--="_--">

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by the Hungarian National Scientific Research Foundation (OTKA-T030340) and by a joint grant of the British Council and the Hungarian OMFB (grant number: GB-31/98).

Linked Articles

  • Correction
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society