rss
Thorax 2002;57:1089 doi:10.1136/thorax.57.12.1089-a
  • Letters to the editor

Marginal benefits of adding formoterol

  1. B J Lipworth,
  2. C M Jackson
  1. Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Ninewells University Hospital, Dundee, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor B J Lipworth, Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Ninewells University Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK;
    topdoc{at}brianlipworth.com

    Price and colleagues1 conclude that adding formoterol confers a therapeutic advantage to inhaled steroid in patients with mild to moderate asthma. During the 6 month follow up, in part II of the study the frequency of the secondary outcome of mild asthma exacerbations differed by 2.5 per patient per 6 months while the difference in poorly controlled asthma days was 4.2 days per patient per 6 months. These differences, while statistically significant, are unlikely to be of real clinical relevance. Indeed, during the same period the difference in quality of life was neither significant nor clinically relevant. The main differences which were significant were in bronchodilator sensitive outcomes such as peak flow and reliever use, which are to be expected when patients are taking a 24/7 bronchodilator. These data are little different from those in steroid naive patients in the OPTIMA trial over 12 months where the addition of formoterol to low dose budesonide improved lung function but not exacerbations, while in the same trial the addition of formoterol conferred only a small but significant reduction in exacerbations in patients previously treated with corticosteroids.2

    Pointedly, neither of these studies evaluated any inflammatory surrogates. We would therefore suggest that these trials indicate that most patients with mild to moderate asthma can be adequately controlled on low to medium doses of inhaled budesonide alone, and that there is only a marginal advantage conferred by adding formoterol. Moreover, combination inhalers are considerably more expensive than inhaled steroid alone and their routine use is not warranted in primary care.

    Reference

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Thorax.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for Thorax. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.