rss
Thorax 2000;55:219-223 doi:10.1136/thorax.55.3.219
  • Original article

Severity prediction rules in community acquired pneumonia: a validation study

  1. W S Lim,
  2. S Lewis,
  3. J T Macfarlane
  1. Respiratory Medicine, City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
  1. Dr J T Macfarlane
  • Received 24 August 1999
  • Revision requested 8 November 1999
  • Revised 30 November 1999
  • Accepted 1 December 1999

Abstract

BACKGROUND The British Thoracic Society (BTS) developed a rule (BTSr) based on severity criteria to predict short term mortality in adults admitted to hospital with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, neither the BTSr nor a recent modification of it (mBTSr) have been validated in the UK. A case-control study was conducted in a typical UK population to determine the clinical factors predictive of mortality and to assess the performance of these rules.

METHODS Cases were drawn from all patients with CAP who died in 1997 in five large hospitals in the Mid Trent area. Controls were randomly selected from survivors. Factors associated with mortality were identified following review of medical case notes and performance of the severity prediction rules assessed.

RESULTS Age >65 years, temperature <37°C, respiratory rate >24 breaths/min, mental confusion, urea concentration of >7 mmol/l, sodium concentration of <135 mmol/l, and the presence of a pleural effusion, all determined on admission, were independently associated with in-hospital mortality on multivariate analysis. The BTSr was 52% sensitive and 79% specific in predicting death while the mBTSr displayed 66% sensitivity and 73% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS The value of three of the four factors (presence of mental confusion, raised respiratory rate, raised urea) used in the mBTSr as predictors of mortality is confirmed. However, the BTSr and mBTSr did not perform as well in this validation study which included a high proportion (48%) of elderly patients (≥75 years) compared with the derivation studies.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This project was funded by a research grant from Hoechst Marion Roussel.

  • Conflicts of interest: None.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.