rss
Thorax 1999;54:750 doi:10.1136/thx.54.8.750c
  • Letters to the editor

Acronyms

  1. TSUNG O CHENG
  1. The George Washington University Medical Center
  2. Department of Medicine
  3. 2150 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.
  4. Washington, DC 20037, USA

I write to protest against the use of unexplained acronyms in your editorial entitled “EUROSCOP, ISOLDE and the Copenhagen City Lung Study”.1 Acronyms are useful and often necessary because they simplify and accelerate modern communication.2 But when first mentioned in any biomedical journals, acronyms must be explained fully.3 Furthermore, abbreviations are prohibited in a title.4

Specialists often take for granted that certain “trade terms” are so evident that they do not bother to define them. I thought that cardiologists, of which I am one, are notorious for using or inventing acronyms.2 Acronymania is contagious. Please do not let our colleagues in respiratory medicine catch this terrible disease.

References

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Thorax.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Thorax. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.