rss
Thorax 1999;54:606-610 doi:10.1136/thx.54.7.606
  • Original article

Prevalence of atopy, asthma symptoms and diagnosis, and the management of asthma: comparison of an affluent and a non-affluent country

Abstract

BACKGROUND The prevalence of childhood asthma and of atopy varies widely between countries. However, few studies have compared the pattern of diagnosis and management of asthma, or the role of atopy in predisposing to asthma between a less affluent country and a more affluent country. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of symptoms, diagnosis, and management of asthma, and the prevalence of atopy as measured by skin prick tests in Nigeria and Australia using a standardised methodology.

METHODS Respiratory history was collected using a validated questionnaire administered to parents, and atopy was measured with skin prick tests in 654 Australian and 566 Nigerian children aged 8–11 years (70% consent rate in Australia, 60% in Nigeria).

RESULTS Wheeze and persistent cough were less prevalent in Nigeria (10.2% and 5.1%, respectively) than in Australia (21.9% and 9.6%, respectively), caused less morbidity, and were less likely to be labelled or treated as asthma than in Australia. There was no significant difference in the overall prevalence of atopy between the two countries (Australia 32.5%, Nigeria 28.2%). Atopy was a strong risk for wheeze in both countries (odds ratio (OR) 3.4 (95% CI 2.3 to 5.1) in Australia, 1.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.3) in Nigeria), especially atopy to house dust mites (OR 3.1 (95% CI 2.1 to 4.7) in Australia, 2.4 (95% CI 1.3 to 4.3) in Nigeria).

CONCLUSION Although there was a similar prevalence of atopy in both countries, Australian children had a higher prevalence of asthma symptoms. Further studies are needed to determine why atopic children in Australia are more at risk of developing asthma. Such studies will have important implications for the prevention of asthma.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.