To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right
of the text. For further help click here.
Electronic Letters to:
|
Electronic letters published:
|
||||
|
Luke S Howard, Respiratory Specialist Registrar Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
Send letter to journal:
luke.howard{at}norfolk-norwich.thenhs.com Luke S Howard |
Dear Editor The data presented by Breen et al[1] regarding the outcomes of patients with COPD are encouraging and lend support to the respiratory physician often faced with nihilistic attitudes towards ventilating these patients in acute respiratory failure. However, despite the proposition by the authors that certain patients with likely poor outcomes might have been excluded, the ICU stays for both groups (intubated and non-intubated) are strikingly short. This suggests that the threshold for intubation as opposed to non- invasive ventilation (NIV) may have been lower before 1994 than in current practice. Although the authors explain the reason for the high levels of PaO2 on admission to the ICU, it could be that the severity of respiratory acidosis may have reflected excess oxygen therapy rather than the severity of the underlying mechanical respiratory failure, thus being more readily reversible and requiring a shorter period of ventilatory support. Although the decision to intubate is not solely based upon blood gases, with the increasing availability of NIV, it might be that a subgroup of these patients would now be managed using controlled oxygen therapy, respiratory stimulants and NIV[2]. As a result, I suspect that the physiological state of the patient that we offer to the ICU in our current practice may be worse than in this study with commensurate outcomes (longer stays and higher mortality). Despite this, many patients still do well and studies of this type need to continue to assess predictors of unfavourable end-points. Luke Howard MA, DPhil, MRCP. References |
|||
Register for free content
Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Thorax.
View free sample issue >>
Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Thorax. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their
subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have
free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
