Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2007

Thorax. Published Online First: 18 January 2007. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.071563
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society.

Papers

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of selenium supplementation in adult asthma

Seif O Shaheen 1*, Roger B Newson 1, Margaret P Rayman 2, Angela P-L Wong 1, Michael K Tumilty 1, Joanna M Phillips 1, James F Potts 3, Frank J Kelly 4, Patrick T White 4 and Peter GJ Burney 1

1 NHLI at Imperial College London, United Kingdom
2 University of Surrey, United Kingdom
3 NHLI at Imperial College London
4 King's College London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.shaheen{at}imperial.ac.uk.

Accepted 11 November 2006


Abstract

Background: Epidemiological evidence from observational studies has suggested that the selenium status of asthmatic adults is lower than that of controls. The only previous trial of selenium supplementation in adults with asthma found no objective evidence of benefit, but involved only 24 participants.

Methods: We carried out a randomised, double- blind, placebo-controlled trial of selenium supplementation in adults with asthma in London, UK, the majority of whom (75%) reported inhaled steroid use at baseline. 197 participants were randomised to receive either a high-selenium yeast preparation (SelenoPreciseTM 100 µg daily, n=99) or placebo (yeast only, n=98) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was asthma-related quality of life (QoL) score. Secondary outcomes included lung function, asthma-symptom scores, peak flow and bronchodilator usage. Linear regression was used to analyse the change in outcome between the two treatment arms by "intention to treat".

Results: There was a 48% increase in plasma selenium between baseline and end of trial in the active treatment group, but no change in the placebo group. Whilst QoL score improved more in the active treatment group than in the placebo group, the difference in change in score between the two groups was not significant [-0.05 (95% CI: -0.19 to 0.09); P=0.47]. Selenium supplementation was not associated with any significant improvement in secondary outcomes compared with placebo.

Conclusions: There was no clinical benefit of selenium supplementation in adults with asthma, the majority of whom were taking inhaled steroids.

Keywords: adult asthma, adults, antioxidants, randomised controlled trial, selenium supplementation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Airwaves
Wisia Wedzicha
Thorax 2007 62: 465. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Dietary supplements and asthma: another one bites the dust
Johanna Feary and John Britton
Thorax 2007 62: 466-468. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mark, J. D. (2009). Pediatric Asthma: An Integrative Approach to Care. Nutr Clin Pract 24: 578-588 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Feary, J., Britton, J. (2007). Dietary supplements and asthma: another one bites the dust. Thorax 62: 466-468 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Chest Medicine Jobs

Chest Medicine Jobs