Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 October 2007

Thorax. Published Online First: 24 April 2007. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.058362
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
thx.2006.058362v1
62/10/855    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forbes, L.
Right arrow Articles by Burney, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forbes, L.
Right arrow Articles by Burney, P.

Papers

Risk factors for accident and emergency attendance for asthma in inner city children

Lindsay Forbes 1*, Sheila Harvey 2, Deborah Jarvis 3, Christina Luczynska 4, Roger Newson 3, John Price 4 and Peter Burney 3

1 Wandsworth Primary Care Trust, Springfield University Hospital,, United Kingdom
2 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
3 Imperial College London, United Kingdom
4 Kings College London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lforbes{at}sgul.ac.uk.

Accepted 26 February 2007


*   Abstract

Background: Inner city children make heavy use of accident and emergency (A and E) services for asthma. Developing strategies to reduce this requires a better understanding of the risk factors.

Methods: We carried out a case control study of children with asthma living in South East London: 1018 children who attended A and E for asthma over one year and 394 children who had not attended A and E for asthma over the previous year. The main risk factors were socioeconomic status, home environment, routine asthma management, and parents’ psychological responses to, and beliefs about the treatment of asthma attacks.

Results: A and E attendance was more common in children living in poorer households. We found no associations with home environment nor measures of routine asthma care. Children who had attended outpatients were much more likely to attend A and E (odds ratio (OR) 13.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.13, 24.33). Other risk factors included: having a parent who reported feeling alone (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.71, 3.87) or panic or fear (OR 2.62. 95% CI 1.75, 3.93) when the child’s asthma was worse; and parental belief that the child would be seen more quickly in A and E than at the GP surgery (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.62, 3.79). Parental confidence in the GP’s ability to treat asthma attacks reduced the risk of attending A and E (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17, 0.54).

Conclusions: We found no evidence that passive smoking, damp homes or poor routine asthma care explain heavy inner city A and E use in children with asthma. Reducing A and E use is unlikely to be achieved by improving these, but identifying appropriate settings for treating children with asthma attacks and communicating these effectively may do so.


Keywords: asthma, emergency medicine, health care utilization







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society