Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 December 2005

Thorax. Published Online First: 14 October 2005. doi:10.1136/thx.2005.046631
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society.

Papers

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in patients with bronchiectasis

M Wickremasinghe 1, L J Ozerovitch 1, G Davies 1, T Woodhouse 1, M V Chadwick 1, S Abdallah 1, P Shah 1 and R Wilson 1*

1 Royal Brompton Hospital, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.wilson{at}rbh.nthames.nhs.uk.

Accepted 10 September 2005


Abstract

Background: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous environmental organisms. Patients with pre-existing lung damage are susceptible to NTM but their prevalence in bronchiectasis is unknown. Distinguishing between lung colonisation and disease can be difficult.

Methods: A prospective study of 100 bronchiectasis patients to evaluate sputum NTM prevalence, and a retrospective analysis over 11 years of clinical, microbiological, lung function and radiology data of our clinic patients with NTM sputum isolates, was performed.

Results: NTM prevalence in this population of bronchiectatics was 2%. Patients in the retrospective study were defined as bronchiectasis and multiple NTM isolates (n=25), bronchiectasis and single isolates (n=23) and non-bronchiectasis and multiple isolates (n=22). Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) species predominated in bronchiectasis compared to non-bronchiectasis lung disease (72% vs. 9% p<0.0001). Single isolates were also frequently MAC (45.5%). Multiple isolates in bronchiectasis were more often smear positive on first sample than single isolates (p<0.0001). NTM were identified on routine screening samples or because of suggestive radiology. No particular bronchiectasis aetiology was associated with a NTM. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were frequently co-cultured. Six (25%) of multiple NTM patients had cavities of which five were due to MAC. Half of patients with multiple isolates were treated, mostly due to progressive radiology.

Conclusions: NTM are uncommon in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Routine screening identifies otherwise unsuspected patients. MAC is the most frequent NTM isolated. Half of patients with multiple isolates were treated, based on progressive radiology.

Keywords: bronchiectasis, lung function, mycobacterium avium complex, non-tuberculous mycobacteria


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Sexton, P., Harrison, A. C. (2008). Susceptibility to nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease. Eur Respir J 31: 1322-1333 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chang, A B, Bilton, D (2008). Exacerbations in cystic fibrosis: 4 {middle dot} Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Thorax 63: 269-276 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fowler, S. J., French, J., Screaton, N. J., Foweraker, J., Condliffe, A., Haworth, C. S., Exley, A. R., Bilton, D. (2006). Nontuberculous mycobacteria in bronchiectasis: prevalence and patient characteristics. Eur Respir J 28: 1204-1210 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Koh, W-J, Kwon, O J, Wilson, R, Wickremasinghe, M, Ozerovitch, L J, Davies, G, Wodehouse, T, Chadwick, M V, Abdallah, S, Shah, P (2006). Bronchiectasis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infection * Authors' reply. Thorax 61: 458-458 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Bronchiectasis and nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infection
Won-Jung Koh, et al.
Thorax Online, 13 Dec 2005 [Full text]
Authors' reply to Koh and Kwon
Robert Wilson
Thorax Online, 21 Dec 2005 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Chest Medicine Jobs

Chest Medicine Jobs