EDITORIAL
Reviewer selection
Reviewer selection: author or editor knows best?
Thorax Editorial Office, BMJ Journals, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor J A Wedzicha
Thorax Editorial Office, BMJ Journals, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR, UK; J.A.Wedzicha@medsch.ucl.ac.uk
Differential behaviour of author and editor suggested reviewers
Keywords: peer review
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Thorax is now the second highest ranked respiratory journal and submissions are increasing year on year.1 To attract high quality manuscripts, authors must have confidence in our editorial process and we are committed to continuing and improving the transparency, efficiency, and fairness of peer review.
When the current Editors took over the journal in 2003, Thorax changed to online manuscript submission2 and, for the first time, authors were formally invited to suggest up to four suitable peer reviewers for their work. Indeed, we encourage authors to suggest reviewers, as set out in our advice to contributors.3 Peer review is a vital step in the editorial process, guiding the selection of appropriate papers for publication and providing constructive comments for authors to improve their work. So, what are the benefits of suggesting reviewers (or not) on the editorial process? There is, in fact, little evidence on the behaviour
Relevant Article
- Airwaves
- Wisia Wedzicha
Thorax 2005 60: 793.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wedzicha, J A, Johnston, S L, Mitchell, D M
(2006). Thorax update for the 60th year (October 2005-September 2006). Thorax
61: 1035-1036
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
