Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER


[Advanced]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brusasco, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brusasco, V
Thorax 2003;58:375-376
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & British Thoracic Society

EDITORIAL

PEF measurements

Usefulness of peak expiratory flow measurements: is it just a matter of instrument accuracy?

V Brusasco

Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Università di Genova, Viale Benedetto XV 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Vito.Brusasco@unige.it

A method for improving the accuracy of peak flow meters will be valuable if the recommendation to measure PEF is to be maintained in asthma management plans. With the currently available peak flow meters, no evidence has been provided that PEF measurements are of clinical usefulness. A large number of new randomised controlled studies using optimally validated peak flow meters would therefore be necessary. However, by that time these instruments may have become obsolete.

Keywords: peak expiratory flow; peak flow meters

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In this issue of Thorax Miller et al1 present a new method for validation of peak flow meters. They show that applying a computer driven explosive decompression can detect inaccuracies in the dynamic response of commercially available peak flow meters that would be missed using the ATS recommended 26 waveforms for spirometer validation. This work is justified by the compelling recommendations to use peak expiratory flow (PEF) as a main or sole measure of lung function, incorporated in the current guidelines for diagnosis and management of asthma.2–5 In particular, PEF is recommended for daily home monitoring and also as a criterion for admission and discharge from the emergency room. For either application, accuracy of measurement is an obvious prerequisite. Indeed, previous works have shown that commercially available peak flow meters may not be accurate enough to allow correct management of a number of asthmatic subjects.6,7 As Miller et . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
J. A. Fonseca, A. Costa-Pereira, L. Delgado, L. N. Silva, M. Magalhaes, M. G. Castel-Branco, and M. Vaz
Pulmonary Function Electronic Monitoring Devices: A Randomized Agreement Study
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1258 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
H K Reddel, S D Vincent, and J Civitico
The need for standardisation of peak flow charts
Thorax, February 1, 2005; 60(2): 164 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
C K Connolly and V Brusasco
Peak flow meters still useful but require consistency rather than accuracy
Thorax, January 1, 2004; 59(1): 82 - 83.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society