© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & British Thoracic Society
EDITORIAL
PEF measurements
Usefulness of peak expiratory flow measurements: is it just a matter of instrument accuracy?
Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Università di Genova, Viale Benedetto XV 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy; Vito.Brusasco@unige.it
A method for improving the accuracy of peak flow meters will be valuable if the recommendation to measure PEF is to be maintained in asthma management plans. With the currently available peak flow meters, no evidence has been provided that PEF measurements are of clinical usefulness. A large number of new randomised controlled studies using optimally validated peak flow meters would therefore be necessary. However, by that time these instruments may have become obsolete.
Keywords: peak expiratory flow; peak flow meters
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In this issue of Thorax Miller et al1 present a new method for validation of peak flow meters. They show that applying a computer driven explosive decompression can detect inaccuracies in the dynamic response of commercially available peak flow meters that would be missed using the ATS recommended 26 waveforms for spirometer validation. This work is justified by the compelling recommendations to use peak expiratory flow (PEF) as a main or sole measure of lung function, incorporated in the current guidelines for diagnosis and management of asthma.2–5 In particular, PEF is recommended for daily home monitoring and also as a criterion for admission and discharge from the emergency room. For either application, accuracy of measurement is an obvious prerequisite. Indeed, previous works have shown that commercially available peak flow meters may not be accurate enough to allow correct management of a number of asthmatic subjects.6,7 As Miller et
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Fonseca, J. A., Costa-Pereira, A., Delgado, L., Silva, L. N., Magalhaes, M., Castel-Branco, M. G., Vaz, M.
(2005). Pulmonary Function Electronic Monitoring Devices: A Randomized Agreement Study. Chest
128: 1258-1265
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Reddel, H K, Vincent, S D, Civitico, J
(2005). The need for standardisation of peak flow charts. Thorax
60: 164-167
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Connolly, C K, Brusasco, V
(2004). Peak flow meters still useful but require consistency rather than accuracy. Thorax
59: 82-83
[Full Text]
- Full Text
- Full Text (PDF)
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me if a correction is posted
- Citation Map
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in this journal
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
- Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
