Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodhead, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodhead, M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Thorax 2003;58:371-372
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & British Thoracic Society


EDITORIAL

Community acquired pneumonia

Assessment of illness severity in community acquired pneumonia: a useful new prediction tool?

M Woodhead

Consultant in General and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL; mark.woodhead@cmmc.nhs.uk


The clinical heterogeneity of CAP means that no severity scoring system will ever be able consistently to separate all patients into correct management subgroups, but the recently developed CURB-65 prediction tool appears to be an advance.

Keywords: community acquired pneumonia; severity assessment

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Illness severity might usefully guide a number of management decisions in the care pathway of a patient with community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Whether to refer to hospital by the primary care physician, whether to admit by the hospital junior doctor, what investigations to perform, what antibiotic(s) to give, and whether to admit to the intensive care unit (ICU) are just some examples. This approach is captured to a varying extent in a number of the published management guidelines for CAP.1–5 While a clinical prediction tool to assess severity might therefore be helpful, there is no agreement on what constitutes the best approach to this. Additional caveats are that such a tool would need to be better than current practice, would need to accurately do what it sets out to do (that is, predict outcome), would need to be simple to use in a variety of settings, would . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

Airwaves
Wisia Wedzicha
Thorax 2003 58: 371. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J D Chalmers, A Singanayagam, and A T Hill
Systolic blood pressure is superior to other haemodynamic predictors of outcome in community acquired pneumonia
Thorax, August 1, 2008; 63(8): 698 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
G. Barlow, D. Nathwani, and P. Davey
The CURB65 pneumonia severity score outperforms generic sepsis and early warning scores in predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia
Thorax, March 1, 2007; 62(3): 253 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society