Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Thorax. Published Online First: 22 October 2009. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.120923
Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society.
Thorax 2009;0:thx.2009.120923
© 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society

The diagnosis of occupational asthma from timepoint differences in serial PEF measurements

Cedd Ben Sherwood Graham Burge1,*, Vicky C Moore1, Charles F Pantin2, Alastair S Robertson3, P Sherwood Burge1

1 Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, United Kingdom;
2 University Hospital of North Staffordshire, United Kingdom;
3 University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

Correspondence to: Cedd Burge, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, United Kingdom; cedd.burge{at}nhs.net

Accepted 29 September 2009

ABSTRACT

Background: The diagnosis of occupational asthma requires objective confirmation. Analysis of serial measurements of Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is usually the most convenient first step in the diagnostic process. We describe a new method of analysis originally developed to detect late asthmatic reactions following specific inhalation testing and have applied it to serial PEF measurements made over many days in the workplace, to supplement existing methods of PEF analysis.

Methods: 236 records from workers with independently diagnosed occupational asthma and 320 from asthmatic controls were available. The pooled standard deviation for rest day measurements was obtained from an analysis of variance by time. Work day PEF measurements were meaned into matching 2-hourly time segments. Timepoints with mean workday PEF statistically lower (at the Bonferroni adjusted 5% level) than the rest days were counted, after adjusting for the number of contributing measurements.

Results: A minimum of 4 timepoint comparisons were needed. Records with ≥2 timepoints significantly lower on workdays had a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 99% for the diagnosis of occupational asthma against independent diagnoses. Reducing the requirements to ≥1 non-waking timepoint difference increased sensitivity to 77% and reduced specificity to 93%. The analysis was only applicable to 43% of available records, mainly due to differences in waking times on work and rest days.

Conclusion: Timepoint analysis complements other validated methods of PEF analysis for the diagnosis of occupational asthma. It requires shorter records than required for the Oasys score and can identify smaller changes than other methods, but is dependent on low restday PEF variance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Chest Medicine Jobs

Chest Medicine Jobs