Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 November 2008

Thorax. Published Online First: 19 June 2008. doi:10.1136/thx.2007.093658
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society.

Papers

Predictors of mortality in acute lung injury during the era of lung-protective ventilation

Eric J Seeley 1*, Danny F McAuley 2, Mark Eisner 1, Michael Miletin 3, Michael A Matthay 1 and Richard H Kallet 1

1 University of California, San Francisco, United States
2 Queen's University, Northern Ireland
3 William Osler Health Center, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: eric.seeley{at}ucsf.edu.

Accepted 2 June 2008


Abstract

Background: Lung-protective ventilation has been widely adopted for the management of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Consequently, ventilator associated lung injury and mortality have decreased. It is unknown if this ventilation strategy changes the prognostic value of previously identified demographic and pulmonary predictors of mortality, such as respiratory compliance and the arterial oxygen tension-to-inspired oxygen fraction ratio (PaO2/FiO2).

Methods: Demographic, clinical, laboratory and pulmonary variables were recorded in 149 patients with ALI/ARDS at the time of diagnosis through the first week of lung injury. Significant predictors of mortality were identified in bivariate analysis and these were entered into multivariate analysis to identify independent predictors of mortality.

Results: Hospital mortality was 41%. In the bivariate analysis, 17 variables were significantly correlated with mortality, including age, APACHE II score and the presence of cirrhosis. Pulmonary parameters associated with death included PaO2/FiO2 and oxygenation index ([mean airway pressure x FiO2 x 100] / PaO2). In unadjusted analysis, the odds ratio of death for the PaO2/FiO2 was 1.57 (CI 1.12, 3.04) per standard deviation decrease. However, in adjusted analysis, PaO2/FiO2 was not a statistically significant predictor of death, with an OR of 1.29 (CI 0.82, 2.02). In contrast, oxygenation index (OI) was a statistically significant predictor of death in both unadjusted analysis, with an OR of 1.89 (CI 1.28, 2.78) and in adjusted analysis, OR 1.84 (CI 1.13, 2.99).

Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with ALI/ARDS, OI was an independent predictor of mortality, whereas PaO2/FiO2 was not. Oxygenation index may be a superior predictor because it integrates both airway pressure and oxygenation into a single variable.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Airwaves
Wisia Wedzicha
Thorax 2008 63: i. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ware, L. B., Eisner, M. D., Flaherty, K. R. (2009). Clinical Year in Review II: Sepsis, Mechanical Ventilation, Occupational and Environmental Lung Disease, and Sleep. Proc Am Thorac Soc 6: 494-499 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Chest Medicine Jobs

Chest Medicine Jobs