Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

Thorax. Published Online First: 4 April 2008. doi:10.1136/thx.2007.081208
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, S. J
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, S. J
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M.

Papers

The minimum clinically important improvement for the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test

Sally J Singh 1*, Paul Jones 2, Rachael Evans 3 and Mike Morgan 4

1 University Hospitals of Leciester NHS Trust, United Kingdom
2 St George's Hospital Medical School, United Kingdom
3 University Hospitals Of Leciester NHS Trust, United Kingdom
4 University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sally.singh{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk.

Accepted 13 February 2008


*   Abstract

Background: The Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) is used to assess exercise capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is employed as an outcome measure for pulmonary rehabilitation. This study was designed to establish the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the ISWT.

Methods: 372 patients (205 male) performed an ISWT before and after a 7 week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme. After completing the course subjects were asked to identify, from a 5-point Likert scale, the perceived change in their exercise performance immediately upon completion of the ISWT. The scale ranged from 'better' to 'worse'

Results: The mean (SD) age was 69.4 (8.4) years, FEV1 1.06 (0.53) litres, and FEV1/FVC ratio 50.8 (18.1) %. Baseline shuttle walking test distance was 168.5(14.6) m. After rehabilitation this increased to 234.7 (125.3) m. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval for the difference was 65.9 (58.9 to72.9) m. For a subject to feel they were 'slightly better' the mean improvement was 47.5 (38.6 to 56.5) m and to report feeling 'better' the mean increase was 78.7 (70.5 to 86.9) m. Patients who reported that their exercise tolerance was 'about the same' increased by a mean of 18.0 (4.5 - 31.5)m.

Conclusion: Two levels of improvement were identified . The minimum clinically important improvement for the ISWT is 47.5m. In addition patients were able to distinguish an additional benefit at 78.7m.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society