Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 December 2007

Thorax. Published Online First: 15 June 2007. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.076430
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow web only appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
thx.2006.076430v1
62/12/1039    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holloway, E. A
Right arrow Articles by West, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holloway, E. A
Right arrow Articles by West, R.

Papers

Integrated breathing and relaxation training (the Papworth Method) for adults with asthma in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

Elizabeth A Holloway 1* and Robert West 2

1 University College London, United Kingdom
2 UCL, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.holloway{at}ucl.ac.uk.

Accepted 19 May 2007


*   Abstract

Background: An integrated breathing and relaxation technique known as the Papworth Method (PM) has been implemented by physiotherapists since the 1960s for patients with asthma and dysfunctional breathing but no controlled trials have been reported. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the PM by means of a randomised controlled trial.

Methods: Eighty-five patients (36 men) were individually randomised to the control group (n=46) or to intervention, receiving five PM sessions of treatment (n=39). Both groups received usual medical care. Assessments were undertaken at baseline, post-treatment (6 months after baseline) and at 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the St George's Respiratory Symptoms Questionnaire (SGRQ). Secondary outcome measures included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Nijmegen dysfunctional breathing questionnaire and objective measures of respiratory function.

Results: Post-treatment and 12-month data were available for 78 and 72 patients respectively. At the post-treatment assessment the mean score on the SGRQ Symptom subscale was 21.8 (SD=18.1) in the intervention group compared with 32.8 (SD=20.1) in the control group (p=0.001 for the difference). At the 12-month follow-up, the corresponding figures were 24.9 (SD=17.9) and 33.5 (SD=15.9) (p=0.007 for the difference). SGRQ Total scores, and HADS and Nijmegen scores were similarly significantly lower in the intervention than control group. The groups did not differ significantly following the treatment on objective measures of respiratory function except for relaxed breathing rate.

Conclusions: The Papworth Method appears to ameliorate respiratory symptoms, dysfunctional breathing and adverse mood compared with usual care. Further controlled trials are warranted to confirm this finding, assess the effect in other patient groups and determine whether there is some effect on objective measures of respiratory function.


Keywords: Asthma, Breathing dysfunction/hyperventilation, Breathing exercises, Randomised controlled trial, Relaxation exercises




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
C O Prys-Picard and R Niven
Dysfunctional breathing in patients with asthma
Thorax, June 1, 2008; 63(6): 568 - 568.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M. G Pearson
Breathing exercises for asthma: panacea or placebo?
Thorax, December 1, 2007; 62(12): 1033 - 1034.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society