Thorax

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 October 2007

Thorax. Published Online First: 3 August 2007. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.075754
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow web only appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
thx.2006.075754v1
62/10/911    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steingart, K. R
Right arrow Articles by Pai, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steingart, K. R
Right arrow Articles by Pai, M.

Review

A systematic review of commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Karen R Steingart 1, Megan Henry 2, Suman Laal 3, Philip C Hopewell 4, Andrew Ramsay 5, Richard Menzies 6, Jane Cunningham 5, Karin Weldingh 7 and Madhukari Pai 8*

1 Francis J Curry National Tuberculosis Center, United States
2 County of Sacramento Department of Health and Human Services, United States
3 New York University School of Medicine, United States
4 University of California, United States
5 UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Switzerland
6 McGill Unversity, Canada
7 Statens Serum Institut, Denmark
8 McGill University, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: madhukar.pai{at}mcgill.ca.

Accepted 9 February 2007


*   Abstract

Conventional diagnostic tests for tuberculosis have several limitations and are often unhelpful in establishing the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Although commercial serological antibody-based tests are available, their utility in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis is unknown. We conducted a systematic review to assess the accuracy of commercial serological antibody detection tests for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. In a comprehensive search, we identified 21 studies that reported data on sensitivity and specificity for extrapulmonary tuberculosis. These studies evaluated seven different commercial tests, with Anda-TB IgG accounting for 48% of the studies. Results of the review demonstrated that (1) all commercial tests provided highly variable estimates of sensitivity (range, 0.00-1.00) and specificity (range, 0.59-1.00) for all extrapulmonary sites combined; (2) the Anda-TB IgG kit showed highly variable sensitivity (range, 0.26-1.00) and specificity (range, 0.59-1.00) for all extrapulmonary sites combined; (3) for all tests combined, sensitivity estimates for both lymph node tuberculosis (range, 0.23-1.00) and pleural tuberculosis (range, 0.26-0.59) were poor and inconsistent; and (4) there were no data to determine accuracy of the tests in children or in patients with HIV infection, the two groups for which the test would be most useful. At the current time, commercial antibody detection tests for extrapulmonary tuberculosis have no role in clinical care or case detection.


Keywords: Humans, Immunoassay, Sensitivity and Specificity, Serologic Tests/methods, Tuberculosis, Extrapulmonary/*diagnosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. Trajman, M. Pai, K. Dheda, R. van Zyl Smit, A. A. Zwerling, R. Joshi, S. Kalantri, P. Daley, and D. Menzies
Novel tests for diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion: what works and what does not?
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2008; 31(5): 1098 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society