Thorax 2008;63:122-128
CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE
Counting, analysing and reporting exacerbations of COPD in randomised controlled trials
1 The Ottawa Health Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
2 The Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
3 Centre de recherche, Hopital Laval, Universite Laval, Montreal, Canada
4 Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
5 Department of Medicine, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
6 The Department of Medicine, Queens University, Canada
7 Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Canada
Dr S D Aaron, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6; saaron{at}ohri.ca
Background: Clinical trials measure exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) inconsistently. A study was undertaken to determine if different methods for ascertaining and analysing COPD exacerbations lead to biased estimates of treatment effects.
Methods: Information on the methods used to count, analyse and report COPD exacerbation rates was abstracted from clinical trials of long-acting bronchodilators or long-acting bronchodilator/inhaled steroid combination products published between 2000 and 2006. Data from the Canadian Optimal Therapy of COPD Trial was used to illustrate how different analytical approaches can affect the estimate of exacerbation rates and their confidence intervals.
Results: 22 trials (17 156 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. None of the trials adjudicated exacerbations or determined independence of events. 14/22 studies (64%) introduced selection bias by not analysing outcome data for subjects who prematurely stopped study medications. Only 31% of trials used time-weighted analyses to calculate the mean number of exacerbations/patient-year and only 15% accounted for between-subject variation. In the Canadian Optimal Therapy of COPD Trial the rate ratio for exacerbations/patient-year was 0.85 when all data were included in a time-weighted analysis, but was overestimated as 0.79 when data for those who prematurely stopped study medications were excluded and was further overestimated as 0.46 when a time-weighted analysis was not conducted; p values ranged from 0.03 to 0.24 depending on how exacerbations were determined and analysed.
Conclusions: Clinical trials have used widely different methods to define and analyse COPD exacerbations and this can lead to biased estimates of treatment effects. Future trials should strive to include blinded adjudication and assessment of the independence of exacerbation events, and trials should report time-weighted intention-to-treat analyses with adjustments for between-subject variation in COPD exacerbations.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Effing, T. W., Kerstjens, H. A. M., Monninkhof, E. M., van der Valk, P. D. L. P. M., Wouters, E. F. M., Postma, D. S., Zielhuis, G. A., van der Palen, J.
(2009). Definitions of Exacerbations: Does It Really Matter in Clinical Trials on COPD?. Chest
136: 918-923
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Tsai, C.-L.
(2009). Temporal Clustering of Exacerbations of COPD: Not-So-Surprising Findings. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
180: 283-283
[Full Text] -
Reddel, H. K., Taylor, D. R., Bateman, E. D., Boulet, L.-P., Boushey, H. A., Busse, W. W., Casale, T. B., Chanez, P., Enright, P. L., Gibson, P. G., de Jongste, J. C., Kerstjens, H. A. M., Lazarus, S. C., Levy, M. L., O'Byrne, P. M., Partridge, M. R., Pavord, I. D., Sears, M. R., Sterk, P. J., Stoloff, S. W., Sullivan, S. D., Szefler, S. J., Thomas, M. D., Wenzel, S. E., on behalf of the American Thoracic Society/Europea,
(2009). An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Asthma Control and Exacerbations: Standardizing Endpoints for Clinical Asthma Trials and Clinical Practice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
180: 59-99
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Laurin, C., Labrecque, M., Dupuis, G., Bacon, S. L., Cartier, A., Lavoie, K. L.
(2009). Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients With Psychiatric Disorders Are at Greater Risk of Exacerbations. Psychosom. Med.
71: 667-674
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Dal Negro, R. W., Bonadiman, L., Turati, C., Turco, P.
(2009). Clinical and pharmacoeconomic profile of COPD patients with FEV1 50--60% predicted: pilot study on the impact of the extended indication of ICS/LABA. Ther Adv Respir Dis
3: 51-58
[Abstract] -
Aaron, S. D.
(2009). COPD Exacerbations: Predicting the Future from the Recent Past. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
179: 335-336
[Full Text] -
Hurst, J. R., Donaldson, G. C., Quint, J. K., Goldring, J. J. P., Baghai-Ravary, R., Wedzicha, J. A.
(2009). Temporal Clustering of Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
179: 369-374
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Black, P N, McDonald, C F
(2009). Interventions to reduce the frequency of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Postgrad. Med. J.
85: 141-147
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Kardos, P.
(2009). Methodological issues in therapeutic trials of COPD. Eur Respir J
33: 443-444
[Full Text] -
Suissa, S.
(2008). Exacerbations and intent-to-treat analyses in randomised trials. Eur Respir J
32: 1117-1118
[Full Text] -
Moss, M., Wilkes, D., Ware, L. B.
(2008). Clinical Year in Review II: Pulmonary Infections in the Immunocompetent Host, Issues in the Training of Fellows and Residents, Asthma, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc
5: 745-750
[Full Text] -
Suissa, S.
(2008). Medications to Modify Lung Function Decline in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Some Hopeful Signs. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
178: 322-323
[Full Text] -
Aaron, S D
(2008). Author's reply. Thorax
63: 750-750
[Full Text] -
Vestbo, J
(2008). Counting, analysing and reporting exacerbations of COPD in randomised controlled trials. Thorax
63: 749-750
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
