HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: thx.2006.066837v1 62/3/219    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Travers, J. Articles by Beasley, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Travers, J. Articles by Beasley, R. Topic Collections Related Articles

External validity of randomised controlled trials in asthma: to whom do the results of the trials apply?

¹ Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
² Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wellington, New Zealand
³ University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor R Beasley
Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, PO Box 10055, Wellington, New Zealand; richard.beasley{at}mrinz.ac.nz

Background: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with a wide range of clinical phenotypes, not all of which may be encompassed in the subjects included in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This makes it difficult for clinicians to know to what extent the evidence derived from RCTs applies to a given patient.

Aim: To calculate the proportion of individuals with asthma who would have been eligible for the major asthma RCTs from the data of a random community survey of respiratory health.

Methods: A postal survey was sent to 3500 randomly selected individuals aged 25–75 years. Respondents were invited to complete a detailed respiratory questionnaire and pulmonary function testing. Participants with current asthma were assessed against the eligibility criteria of the 17 major asthma RCTs cited in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines.

Findings: A total of 749 participants completed the full survey, of whom 179 had current asthma. A median 4% of participants with current asthma (range 0–36%) met the eligibility criteria for the included RCTs. A median 6% (range 0–43%) of participants with current asthma on treatment met the eligibility criteria.

Interpretation: This study shows that the major asthma RCTs on which the GINA guidelines are based may have limited external validity as they have been performed on highly selected patient populations. Most of the participants with current asthma on treatment in the community would not have been eligible for these RCTs.

Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FEV₁, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; GINA, Global Initiative for Asthma; RCT, randomised controlled trial

Related Articles

Airwaves

Wisia Wedzicha
Thorax 2007 62: 193. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Michils, S. Baldassarre, and A. Van Muylem Exhaled nitric oxide and asthma control: a longitudinal study in unselected patients Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2008; 31(3): 539 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Travers, S. Marsh, S. Aldington, M. Williams, P. Shirtcliffe, A. Pritchard, M. Weatherall, and R. Beasley Reference Ranges for Exhaled Nitric Oxide Derived from a Random Community Survey of Adults Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2007; 176(3): 238 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Town Applying the results of randomised control trials on asthma Thorax, March 1, 2007; 62(3): 195 - 196. [Full Text] [PDF]