Thorax 2006;61:783-790
TUBERCULOSIS
Current evidence on diagnostic accuracy of commercially based nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
1 Dipartimento di Malattie Polmonari, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy
2 Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
3 Dipartimento di Epidemiologia, INMI L Spallanzani-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
Correspondence to:
Dr S Greco
Dipartimento di Malattie Polmonari, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, 00151 Rome, Italy; stgreco{at}scamilloforlanini.rm.it
Background: Even though commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have become the most frequently used molecular tests for laboratory diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), published studies report variable estimates of their diagnostic accuracy. We analysed the accuracy of commercial NAATs for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in smear positive and smear negative respiratory samples using culture as a reference standard.
Methods: English language studies reporting data sufficient for calculating sensitivity and specificity of commercial NAATs on smear positive and/or smear negative respiratory samples were included. Meta-regression was used to analyse associations with reference test quality, the prevalence of TB, sample and test type. Predictive values for different levels of pre-test probability were quantified using Bayes approach.
Results: Sixty three journal articles published between 1995 and 2004 met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 and 0.85 among smear positive samples and 0.66 and 0.98 among smear negative samples. The number of culture media used as reference test, the inclusion of bronchial samples, and the TB prevalence were found to influence the reported accuracy. The test type had no effect on the diagnostic odds ratio but seemed to be correlated with sensitivity or specificity, probably via a threshold effect.
Conclusions: Commercial NAATs can be confidently used to exclude TB in patients with smear positive samples in which environmental mycobacteria infection is suspected and to confirm TB in a proportion of smear negative cases. The methodological characteristics of primary studies have a considerable effect on the reported diagnostic accuracy.
Abbreviations: AFB, acid-fast bacilli; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; MTB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; TB, tuberculosis
Keywords: nucleic acid amplification techniques; tuberculosis; diagnostic tests; meta-analysis
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Greco, S., Rulli, M., Girardi, E., Piersimoni, C., Saltini, C.
(2009). Diagnostic Accuracy of In-House PCR for Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Smear-Positive Patients: Meta-Analysis and Metaregression. J. Clin. Microbiol.
47: 569-576
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Guerra, R. L., Hooper, N. M., Baker, J. F., Alborz, R., Armstrong, D. T., Kiehlbauch, J. A., Conde, M. B., Dorman, S. E.
(2008). Cost-Effectiveness of Different Strategies for Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Testing for Cases of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 3811-3812
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Guerra, R. L., Baker, J. F., Alborz, R., Armstrong, D. T., Kiehlbauch, J. A., Conde, M. B., Dorman, S. E., Hooper, N. M.
(2008). Specimen Dilution Improves Sensitivity of the Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test for Smear Microscopy-Positive Respiratory Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 314-316
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Mendelson, M.
(2007). Diagnosing tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients: challenges and future prospects. Br Med Bull
0: ldm009v1-17
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
