Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 3 March 2006. doi:10.1136/thx.2005.054767
Thorax 2006;61:651-656
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society.

ASTHMA

Double blind randomised controlled trial of two different breathing techniques in the management of asthma

C A Slader1, H K Reddel2, L M Spencer3, E G Belousova2, C L Armour4, S Z Bosnic-Anticevich4, F C K Thien5 and C R Jenkins2

1 Co-operative Research Centre for Asthma, University of Sydney, and Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Australia
2 Co-operative Research Centre for Asthma, University of Sydney, and Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Camperdown, Australia
3 Department of Physiotherapy, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
4 University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
5 Co-operative Research Centre for Asthma, Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
C A Slader
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2006; cassandra{at}pharm.usyd.edu.au

Background: Previous studies have shown that breathing techniques reduce short acting ß2 agonist use and improve quality of life (QoL) in asthma. The primary aim of this double blind study was to compare the effects of breathing exercises focusing on shallow nasal breathing with those of non-specific upper body exercises on asthma symptoms, QoL, other measures of disease control, and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose. This study also assessed the effect of peak flow monitoring on outcomes in patients using breathing techniques.

Methods: After a 2 week run in period, 57 subjects were randomised to one of two breathing techniques learned from instructional videos. During the following 30 weeks subjects practised their exercises twice daily and as needed for relief of symptoms. After week 16, two successive ICS downtitration steps were attempted. The primary outcome variables were QoL score and daily symptom score at week 12.

Results: Overall there were no clinically important differences between the groups in primary or secondary outcomes at weeks 12 or 28. The QoL score remained unchanged (0.7 at baseline v 0.5 at week 28, p = 0.11 both groups combined), as did lung function and airway responsiveness. However, across both groups, reliever use decreased by 86% (p<0.0001) and ICS dose was reduced by 50% (p<0.0001; p>0.10 between groups). Peak flow monitoring did not have a detrimental effect on asthma outcomes.

Conclusion: Breathing techniques may be useful in the management of patients with mild asthma symptoms who use a reliever frequently, but there is no evidence to favour shallow nasal breathing over non-specific upper body exercises.

Abbreviations: ACQ, Asthma Control Questionnaire; AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; PEF, peak expiratory flow

Keywords: asthma; complementary medicine; breathing techniques; Buteyko; randomised controlled trial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Airwaves
Wisia Wedzicha
Thorax 2006 61: 643. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Reddel, H. K., Taylor, D. R., Bateman, E. D., Boulet, L.-P., Boushey, H. A., Busse, W. W., Casale, T. B., Chanez, P., Enright, P. L., Gibson, P. G., de Jongste, J. C., Kerstjens, H. A. M., Lazarus, S. C., Levy, M. L., O'Byrne, P. M., Partridge, M. R., Pavord, I. D., Sears, M. R., Sterk, P. J., Stoloff, S. W., Sullivan, S. D., Szefler, S. J., Thomas, M. D., Wenzel, S. E., on behalf of the American Thoracic Society/Europea, (2009). An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Asthma Control and Exacerbations: Standardizing Endpoints for Clinical Asthma Trials and Clinical Practice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 180: 59-99 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bott, J, Blumenthal, S, Buxton, M, Ellum, S, Falconer, C, Garrod, R, Harvey, A, Hughes, T, Lincoln, M, Mikelsons, C, Potter, C, Pryor, J, Rimington, L, Sinfield, F, Thompson, C, Vaughn, P, White, J, on behalf of the British Thoracic Society Physioth, (2009). Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of the adult, medical, spontaneously breathing patient. Thorax 64: i1-i52 [Full Text]  
  • van der Wouden, J. C, Verhagen, A. P (2007). Breathing techniques in the management of asthma. Thorax 62: 835-835 [Full Text]  
  • Slader, C. A, Belousova, E. G, Reddel, H. K (2007). Measuring peak flow enhances adherence to monitoring in asthma. Thorax 62: 741-742 [Full Text]  
  • Bruton, A, Thomas, M (2006). Breathing therapies and bronchodilator use in asthma.. Thorax 61: 643-645 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Chest Medicine Jobs

Chest Medicine Jobs