Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Thorax 2002;57:661-666; doi:10.1136/thorax.57.8.661
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society.
Thorax 2002;57:661-666
© 2002 Thorax

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A randomised controlled crossover trial of nurse practitioner versus doctor led outpatient care in a bronchiectasis clinic

L D Sharples1,2, J Edmunds3, D Bilton3, W Hollingworth4, N Caine2,4, M Keogan3,5, A Exley3

1 MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK
2 R&D Unit, Papworth Hospital NHS Trust, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB3 8RE, UK
3 Lung Defence Unit, Papworth Hospital NHS Trust
4 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge
5 Department of Immunology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr L D Sharples, MRC Biostatistics Unit, University Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK;
linda.sharples{at}mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk

Background: With the decrease in junior doctor hours, the advent of specialist registrars, and the availability of highly trained and experienced nursing personnel, the service needs of patients with chronic respiratory diseases attending routine outpatient clinics may be better provided by appropriately trained nurse practitioners.

Methods: A randomised controlled crossover trial was used to compare nurse practitioner led care with doctor led care in a bronchiectasis outpatient clinic. Eighty patients were recruited and randomised to receive 1 year of nurse led care and 1 year of doctor led care in random order. Patients were followed up for 2 years to ensure patient safety and acceptability and to assess differences in lung function. Outcome measures were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), 12 minute walk test, health related quality of life, and resource use.

Results: The mean difference in FEV1 was 0.2% predicted (95% confidence interval –1.6 to 2.0%, p=0.83). There were no significant differences in the other clinical or health related quality of life measures. Nurse led care resulted in significantly increased resource use compared with doctor led care (mean difference £1497, 95% confidence interval £688 to £2674, p<0.001), a large part of which resulted from the number and duration of hospital admissions. The mean difference in resource use was greater in the first year (£2625) than in the second year (£411).

Conclusions: Nurse practitioner led care for stable patients within a chronic chest clinic is safe and is as effective as doctor led care, but may use more resources.

Keywords: bronchiectasis; nurse practitioner


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Nathan, J. A., Pearce, L., Field, C., Dotesio-Eyres, N., Sharples, L. D., Cafferty, F., Laroche, C. M. (2006). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Follow-up of Patients Discharged From the Hospital Following Acute Asthma: Best Performed by Specialist Nurse or Doctor?. Chest 130: 51-57 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kamps, A.W.A., Roorda, R.J., Kimpen, J.L.L., Overgoor-van de Groes, A.W., van Helsdingen-Peek, L.C.J.A.M., Brand, P.L.P. (2004). Impact of nurse-led outpatient management of children with asthma on healthcare resource utilisation and costs. Eur Respir J 23: 304-309 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kamps, A W A, Brand, P L P, Kimpen, J L L, Maille, A R, Overgoor-van de Groes, A W, van Helsdingen-Peek, L C J A M, Roorda, R J (2003). Outpatient management of childhood asthma by paediatrician or asthma nurse: randomised controlled study with one year follow up. Thorax 58: 968-973 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • (2003). OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02). Evid. Based Nurs. 6: e1-1 [Full Text]  
  • Rafferty, S, Elborn, J S (2002). Do nurses do it better?. Thorax 57: 659-660 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Chest Medicine Jobs

Chest Medicine Jobs