Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Thorax 2002;57:865-868; doi:10.1136/thorax.57.10.865
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society.
Thorax 2002;57:865-868
© 2002 Thorax

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane fluticasone and beclomethasone in patients with asthma

G P Currie, S J Fowler, A M Wilson, E J Sims, L C Orr, B J Lipworth

Asthma & Allergy Research Group, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor B J Lipworth, Asthma & Allergy Research Group, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK;
b.j.lipworth{at}dundee.ac.uk

Background: With the transition to hydrofluoroalkane-134a propellants in metered dose inhalers, it is important to consider the efficacy and safety profiles of formulations containing inhaled corticosteroids. We examined the airway and systemic effects of hydrofluoroalkane-134a fluticasone propionate (FLU-HFA) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BEC-HFA) at recommended labelled doses.

Methods: Twenty mild to moderate asthmatics were randomised in crossover fashion to receive 6 weeks of 500 µg/day followed by 1000 µg/day FLU-HFA and BEC-HFA. Measurements were made at baseline after placebo run in and washout, and after each randomised treatment. The primary airway outcome for benefit was the dose of methacholine provoking a fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 20% or more (methacholine PD20) and for systemic adverse effects was overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine (OUCC).

Results: For mean responses, both doses of BEC-HFA and FLU-HFA produced significant improvements in PD20 compared with baseline. The improvement was not significantly greater with 1000 µg/day FLU-HFA versus BEC-HFA, a 1.69 fold difference (95% CI 0.94 to 3.04). Both doses of BEC-HFA but not FLU-HFA caused significant suppression of OUCC compared with baseline, with significantly (p<0.05) lower values at 1000 µg/day for BEC-HFA versus FLU-HFA (1.97 fold difference (95% CI 1.28 to 3.02)).

Conclusion: There was no difference in the airway and systemic effects in patients with mild to moderate asthma between FLU-HFA and BEC-HFA at a dose of 500 µg/day. At 1000 µg/day there was increased systemic bioactivity with BEC-HFA compared with FLU-HFA, without any gain in airway efficacy.

Keywords: asthma; hydrofluoroalkane-134a; fluticasone; beclomethasone


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Frezza, G, Terra-Filho, J, Martinez, J A B, Vianna, E O (2003). Rapid effect of inhaled steroids on nocturnal worsening of asthma. Thorax 58: 632-633 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Chest Medicine Jobs

Chest Medicine Jobs