Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Thorax 2002;57:7-10; doi:10.1136/thorax.57.1.7
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Thoracic Society.
Thorax 2002;57:7-10
© 2002 Thorax

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Choosing the surgical mortality threshold for high risk patients with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer: insights from decision analysis

J Dowie, M Wildman

Public Health and Policy Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor J Dowie, Public Health and Policy Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK;
jack.dowie{at}lshtm.ac.uk

The recent British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that surgical mortality should not be greater than 8% for pneumonectomy and 4% for lobectomy. These cut offs are advanced as guidelines to inform decision making as to whether or not patients with operable lung cancer should be offered surgery. They have been developed from a notion of what acceptable surgical mortality should be. The planning of care for patients with lung cancer involves making choices between different treatments with different outcomes. While it is accepted that the probability of these outcomes is likely to differ among patients, individual patient preferences for them are also likely to vary. Fixed cut offs for surgical mortality mean ignoring this variation. Decision analysis can be used to assist in the complex task of integrating clinical characteristics and varying patient preferences. By considering high risk patients with potentially curable stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer, it is shown that decision analysis has the potential to illuminate decision making and guideline development within the field of cancer care.

Keywords: decision analysis; lung cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Colice, G. L., Shafazand, S., Griffin, J. P., Keenan, R., Bolliger, C. T. (2007). Physiologic Evaluation of the Patient With Lung Cancer Being Considered for Resectional Surgery: ACCP Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition). Chest 132: 161S-177S [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tan, C., Treasure, T., Browne, J., Utley, M., Davies, C. W H, Hemingway, H. (2007). Seeking consensus by formal methods: a health warning. JRSM 100: 10-14 [Full Text]  
  • Berrisford, R., Brunelli, A., Rocco, G., Treasure, T., Utley, M., On behalf of the Audit and guidelines committee of, (2005). The European Thoracic Surgery Database project: modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 28: 306-311 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Macbeth, F, Dowie, J, Wildman, M (2002). Decision analysis in NSCLC. Thorax 57 : 919-920 [Full Text]  
  • Treasure, T (2002). Whose lung is it anyway?. Thorax 57: 3-4 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Chest Medicine Jobs

Chest Medicine Jobs